“Dr. Weeks, What is are your thoughts about the COVID vaccine which some legislators propose be mandatory?” (https://www.fox5ny.com/news/new-york-legislation-would-make-covid-19-vaccination-mandatory)
I get this question multiple times each day so I want to clarify my thoughts now for your and your loved ones’ consideration.
First off, please think with me and appreciate the fact that what is being called a vaccine is not a vaccine in the legal or the scientific sense of the word. What? Yup. A vaccine is a vaccine because it vaccinates. What does it mean to vaccinate? What do vaccines do? They do at least 2 things: 1) they stimulate immunity by delivering a tiny amount of a pathogen (antigen) which educates the immune system to recognize and mount an immune response (antibodies) to the attacking antigen. And the second thing that a vaccines does is to inhibit transmission so that the vaccinated person does not infect others. These current 4 “vaccines” do not do those deeds so they are not properly called vaccines. What are they? They are medical devices. Albeit tiny, the mRNA mechanism which alters the DNA of the recipient is a medical device and not a vaccine. Just sayin’… might want to explore this further. Here is the CDC’s definition of a vaccine: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm
and here is the legal definition of a vaccine. https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/vaccine
So why is it called a “vaccine”? Three reasons: 1) if the injection is considered a vaccine, then the manufacturer has no liability for damages and death caused by the administration of the medical device; 2) if the injection is considered a vaccine, then the safety testing can be skipped and it can be given experimentally to humans, 3) if the injection is considered a vaccine, then people will accept it because they have been conditioned and programed to think that vaccines are good. So, for starters, don’t be fooled. You are not being offered a vaccine, you are being offered a medical device which will alter your DNA – you will be genetically modified.
Getting back to vaccines: The more one studies the science of vaccinations, the more one is suspect of the current offering, the COVID-19 mRNA.
(Best resource for getting a clear understanding of the pros and cons of vaccines is http://www.nvic.org)
Before we focus on the vaccine/medical device itself, let’s consider the recipient: YOU! The outcome of any therapeutic intervention depends upon two factors: the health and vitality as well as the vulnerabilities of the recipient (i.e. the recipient’s of ability to utilize the therapeutic suggestions inherent in the vaccine) and the pros and cons of the therapy, in this case the vaccine.
Otherwise stated, not everyone will respond identically to an identical vaccine/medical device. So any wise doctor would advise you NOW to take action to optimize your lifestyle choices and enhance you immune function. Sadly none of the experts are suggesting that you be proactive; instead you are all encouraged to passively rely upon a novel and unproven vaccine whose study designs were faulty. Even Forbes magazine revealed the following about the designs of the COVID vaccine studies: they were designed to succeed!
Given the fact that enhancing our own immune function is always the wisest strategy, it’s important to understand for whom this vaccine is appropriate and for whom it is contraindicated.
WHO IS VULNERABLE?
Since the purported goal of vaccine/medical device is to prevent sickness and death related to the COVID-19 virus, and since the majority of people worldwide (less that 0.6%) are NOT at significant risk of suffering and dying from COVID, it is logical and therapeutic to NOT offer the vaccine to the great majority of humanity. Does that logic surprise you?
“ According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the overall mortality rate for the new SARS coronavirus causing COVID-19 is about 0.6 percent, 5 although some scientists say it is lower, 6 while others estimate it can be as high as one to two percent in some parts of the world. 7 Compared to Ebola with a 50 percent mortality rate 8or smallpox, at 30 percent; 9 tuberculosis at 20 to 70 percent; 10 diphtheria at 5 to 10 percent; 11 or the 1918 influenza pandemic with a 2.5 percent mortality rate, 12 COVID-19 is near the bottom of the infectious diseases mortality scale with a less one percent mortality rate in most countries.” https://www.nvic.org/nvic-vaccine-news/september-2020/vaccination-whats-trust-got-to-do-with-it.aspx
Children, for example, are almost entirely resistant to death from COVID as are adults under the age of 70 – save those with compromised hemoglobin (oxygen carrying capacity) such as diabetics, coagulation disorders and those with underlying respiratory illnesses (pneumonia, COPD, asthma and allergies). Also, those with frailty due to advanced age are vulnerable and need protection.
Sad to say, this irrefutable logic (i.e. don’t give a vaccines/medical devices to people who don’t need it) fails to convince most vaccine advocates who, for the past 20 years have been endorsing the Hepatitis B vaccine at birth – even though the benefit of this vaccine is specifically designed to prevent sexually transmitted illness – something a newborn does not concern itself with for at least a decade or two hence. Of course, the alleged protection of this vaccine does not persist over the decades, so this is a nonsensical vaccine for newborns and furthermore, it harms far more than it helps.
THE VACCINE /MEDICAL DEVICE
Now let’s look at the vaccine/medical device itself.
All of the COVID vaccines/medical device are mRNA vaccines which means they will forever alter your own DNA. They will change you. You will be forever more altered down to the essence of your Individuality: your genes. Your genes are the instruments whch you inherited from your parents and your ancestors which make you human. Your genes are what makes you unique and now when you accept thie mRNA COVID vaccine, the you you know will disappear and a new you will be born. Of course, if you are someone who happily accepts GMO (genetically modified food, then this COVID mRNA vaccine is for you. Now you don’t have to eat GMO food to undermine your own genetics, you are yourself now GMO.
Remember Clint Eastwood’s character in Dirty Harry saying to the punk: “Do you feel lucky? Do you?” I am asking you the same question now. Do you trust the “experts” (most of whom have shameful conflicts of interest) when they suggest to accept this mRNA vaccine which is the first of a completely new type of vaccine. First, you say? That is correct. No mRNA vaccine has ever before been licensed for human use. Step right up. (for a more ominous perspective on this DNA altering vaccine, review these wise and prescient words from 1917).
Most vaccines work by introducing a foreign substance (antigen) which threatens your immune system just enough provoke a robust immune response (antibody) while stopping short of causing permanent damage. For the purpose of explanation, imagine coming home to a cold house. What can you do? Well, one option is to start a fire in the fireplace (safe, reasonable effort to warm up your home) but let’s agree that it would not be wise to set your entire house on fire just to warm things up. If that sounds like an extreme example, read about any of the vaccines side effects, for example: “anti-phospholipid syndrome” an incurable side-effect of vaccines wherein your immune system overreacts to the irritants (adjuvants) in the vaccine and mistakenly makes your blood clot in your legs, lungs, brain and other vital organs. This is a horrible auto-immune illness where your immune system attacks itself. Your house is now ablaze and burning down with you in it. (read https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1809502/)
Policy makers, who take seriously their responsibility, adhere to the Precautionary Principle which emphasizes caution, pausing and review before leaping into new innovations that may prove disastrous.
As a medical student, I was once told by a wise professor Dr. Alan Tisdale “Brad, remember once you are practicing medicine, that when a new drug comes on the market, you should use as much of it as you can before it is recalled.”You are correct if you detect sarcasm in that advice, as he was indeed being facetious. It is a tragic fact that many drugs “approved by the FDA” are soon recalled because of unforeseen dangerous side-effects. But as regards vaccines, this is particularly true since vaccines have inadequate safety testing.
“What the public does not realize is that actual serious side effects, which are extremely rare, are unlikely to be detected in the pre-licensing phases of vaccine testing, as the number of test subjects is simply too small; i.e., the power of the study is too low. In other words, pre-licensing studies can provide excellent estimates of efficiency, but they cannot rule out any very rare side effects.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694388/
And why do the COVID vaccines/medical devices need to be stored at the ungodly temperature of minus 70 Celsius (-94 Farenheit)? Because the COVID vaccines are introducing a never before tested nanotechnology into your body: the PEGylated lipid nanoparticles. These nanopraticles are a biofilm stealth technology which is required to render the inhuman mRNA genetic material invisible to the immune system because it is something your immune system would NEVER tolerate. Remember the 1970’s margarine ad: “Its not nice to fool Mother Nature”? Well, let me warn you emphatically that Mother Nature will be really PISSED OFF at this unproven COVID vaccine.
All modern vaccines have additional material (adjuvants) which increase your risk for serious side effects including incurable auto-immune illnesses. (details here ). One concerned mother made a list of the adjuvants in her child’s vaccine and called up Poison Control and explained that her infant had ingested what was on the list: formaldehyde, Tween 80, mercury, aluminum, phenoxyethanol, potassium phosphate, sqalene, sodium phosphate, sorbitol) and was told that each ingredient was poisonous to her child. Another worrisome part of this COVID vaccine/medical device (in addition to the dangerous PEGylated lipid nanoparticles) is an invisible dye which will track you. Sound paranoid? Just read what the MIT scientists are offering: “MIT researchers have now develop a novel way to record a patient’s vaccination history: storing the data in a pattern of dye invisible to the naked eye that is delivered under the skin at the same timeas the vaccine.” https://news.mit.edu/2019/storing-vaccine-history-skin-1218 (PS -Yes you guessed it: this MIT research was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation).
It is a scientifically irrefutable fact that adjuvant agents in vaccines are threats to your immune integrity. What is debatable is whether they help more than they hurt you.
TRUST BUT VERIFY
Leaders will get “vaccinated” on live TV to “prove” safety. Will you fall for this non-scientific propaganda stunt? Watch this staged dis-information effort involving Queensland Premiere Annastacia Palaszczuk who magically received the vaccine without the needle cap being removed! (skip to 20 seconds). Fortunately, our political leaders are more trustworthy so when Bush and Clinton and Obama all volunteered to get the vaccine “publically to prove it is safe” many of you, dear Readers, will believe them never wondering whether it is saline in the syringe…
CAUSAL OR NON-CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP?
Take a deep breath and consider with me three variables:
1) people born in 1957 were given a grand total of 3 vaccines before age 20; today the number of vaccines given to an American child before the age of 20 is 74 vaccines;
2) people born in 1957 played with healthy kids – childhood then was the realm of vitality and resilience; today, the health of American children is abysmal: 54% of American children have one or more chronic illness; 49.5% of American teenagers (13-18 yrs old) have one or more mental illnesses; 1 in 13 American children have food allergies, 1 in 12 American children has asthma; 1 in 285 American children will have cancer before age 20. (Learn more here and watch this video.)
Is there a connection between the rotten health of our kids today and excessive vaccinations – all of which contain irrefutably toxic, auto-immune inducing adjuvants? I wonder. We do know from the comparison of the health of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated kids that the kids who were not vaccinated are much more healthy. Sadly, this information comes from CDC data which they refused to share until forced to when the CDC was served Freedom of Information (FOIA) requests. You will be shocked. For example, the rate of autism is 7.6x more for kids who were vaccinated compared to kids who were not vaccinated.
Lastly as regards kids and the COVID vaccine/medical device, on ABC News (Dec 9th 2020) Fauci commented on the “significant” (read “severe”) allergic (read “autoimmune and incurable”) reactions which two Brits had to the Pfizer vaccine. He warned “If I were a person that had an underlying allergic tendency, I might want to be prepared that I might get a reaction.”
SAY WHAT?? Given that 1 in 12 American kids have asthma and 1 in 13 American kids have food allergies (including peanut allergy which derives from the peanut oil which is an adjuvant in many vaccines) – are you OK with 1 in 13 American kids having a dangerous, autoimmune reaction to the COVID vaccine/medical device?
PRIMUM NON NOCERE
The first rule of civilized medical care is “Primum non Nocere” which means “First do no harm”. So how safe are vaccines in general and the COVID vaccines in particular? Prepare to be shocked again. Inadequate safety testing is the norm for all vaccines, but even MORE worrisome is the rush to market we all are witnessing with the COVID vaccines. If you trust the experts who tell you incessantly that vaccines are tested rigorously for safety, this will disappoint you.
“Vaccines are characterized by FDA not as drugs, but as biologics, and that gives FDA the capacity to fast track them without all of that rigorous and bothersome testing.
These are the two hepatitis B vaccines that are the only two that are approved for one day old children. So these vaccines are given to virtually every child that’s born in this country in a hospital today.
Here was the safety review period, four days.
That means if a baby had a seizure and died on the fifth day, it never happened, it wouldn’t ever be reported, no one will ever know because they only look at them for four days.
This one got five days. And then, look at this, there was no placebo.
So what are they measuring it against? How do they even tell whether the test group had an unusual number of illnesses unless there’s a placebo group to test them against? Of course they can’t, it’s not real safety science.
Yet, this is the only testing that these vaccines received, so whoever approved these vaccines was not making an evidence-based decision. They were making a decision based upon something else.
Here’s the polio vaccine for two-month-old children, the safety review was 48 hours. Look at the placebo group, they tested against the DTP vaccine.
This is the vaccine that was causing so many injuries that it caused Congress to pass the Vaccine Act because manufacturers were saying, “We’re getting sued so much that we’re going to “go out of business.” That’s not real science.
That’s not a placebo, that’s what we call a spiked placebo. A placebo where you’re using something toxic.”
– excerpt from essay by RFK Jr.
To learn more, spend $10 and support, as I do, Robert Kennedy Jr.’s heroic mission to save our children.
The testing for COVID is inaccurate and so all the data we hear incessantly on the media is meaningless. If you can’t accurately diagnose the illness, you can’t claim to know how many people are infected.
I knew the brilliant Nobel laureate Kary Mullis who won his Nobel prize for inventing the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). His opinion (and that of all scientists who understand PCR agree) was that the PCR test is not capable to accurately diagnosing an infection. “PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.”
Consequently, the false positive test results now approach 100%. Even the CDC agrees and last August reduced the actual number of people who died from COVID from 150K to 9K. Oops!
It is hard now days to get accurate news and as a scientist, hard to get accurate data to analyze. Bias is everywhere. Experts are compromised with conflicts of interest. Our educational system fails us since it no longer teaches students how to think but rather simply what to know.
As regards this current vaccines/medical devices, I can share that I (as well as most of my colleagues) would respectfully refuse to be vaccinated/”medical deviced”. Why would well-educated, highly credentialed medical doctors and scientists refuse the vaccine? Quite simply because we all would prefer to get infected with COVID and take corrective immune enhancing protocols to overcome COVID as we do other infectious agents. Why would I say that? Because we all rely more upon optimizing our own immune function than we would upon vaccinations/medical devices. With heartfelt blessings on anyone who has died from COVID, we all nevertheless endorse relying upon a robust immune system and letting it get a “work out” fighting COVID because, as Friedrich Nietzsche taught “That which doesn’t kill us outright makes us stronger.” Like any challenge in life, struggling to overcome it and succeeding makes us better (stronger and healthier).
I understood as a young child that there are three kinds of people in the world: those that make things happen, those that watch things happen and those who wonder what happened. If you are not making things happen then you are watching or wondering. If you are wondering (and also getting in line for the COVID vaccine) I urge you to remember what Dirty Harry asked the punk: “Do you feel lucky?”
Let’s be entirely clear: Being lucky is not a consistently reliable health strategy. As a doctor committed to support your health, I am here to encourage you NOT to rely upon luck, although admittedly, it worked out well for this fortunate young child in the photo below!
Bradford S. Weeks, M.D. Dec. 13th 2020Share